Appendix


Section: 1.1

 

Section: 1.2

 

Section: 1.3

 

Section: 1.4

 

Section: 1.5

 

Section: 1.6

 

Section: 1.7

 

Section: 1.8

 

Section: 1.9

 

Section: 1.10

 

Section: 1.11

 

Section: 1.12

 

Section: 1.13

 

Section: 1.14

 

Section: 1.15

 

Section: 1.16

 

Section: 1.17

 

Section: 1.18

 

Section: 1.19

 

Section: 1.20

 

Section: 1.21

 

Section: 1.22

 

Section: 1.23

 

Section: 1.24

 

Section: 1.25

 

Section: 1.26

 

Section: 1.27

 

Section: 1.28

 

Section: 1.29: J2/J5 Calculation logic:

 

Automatic population of Report times

 

ARISj does NOT automatically calculate the follow-up number for an initial/follow-up report. This information is collected on Informed Authority screen and is currently entered manually by the business user. After the suggested functionality implementation the users would no longer be required to enter the follow-up information manually. As long as the acknowledgement is imported using ESM, this calculation will be performed.

 

Assumptions

 

  1. This calculation will be done at ESM when the case is exported

  2. This will be applicable only for Japanese transactions

  3. This automatic calculation will be applied upon export of a case

 

Only J2(M2) Calculation will be performed when the "Resubmission" field is checked for the Informed Authority record for the version of the case.

 

Calculation Logic

 

The J.2, M.2 and J.5 fields are to be automatically calculated by ESMServer and update to ARISj database base on the following logic.

These tags should be calculated based on the A.1.6 (Message Transmission Acknowledgement Code) and B.1.8 (Report Acknowledgement code) fields of the acknowledgement of the previous transmission.

 

ACK from previous report

Current ICSR+J file

 

A.1.6

B.1.8

J2(M2)

J5

Data accepted at MHLW?

01

01

+1

+1

Yes

01

02

+1

+1

Yes

02

01

Invalid combination

No

02

02

+1

Same as previous report

No

03

01

Invalid combination

No

03

02

+1

Same as previous report

No

No ACK in case of parse error, file name error, etc. MHLW will send the company an email to notify. Resubmission of the case required.

+1

Same as previous report

No

 

The value of the "Resubmission" field should be considered in automatic calculation logic for the J.2, M.2 and J.5 fields. When the value of the "Resubmission" field is considered,  the logic is as the following table:

 

ACK from previous report

"Resubmission" field

Data accepted at MHLW?

Current ICSR+J file

A.1.6

B.1.8

J2(M2)

J5

01

01

Uncheck

Yes

+1

+1

01

01

Check

Yes

But re-submission is required.

+1

Same as previous report

01

02

Uncheck

Yes

+1

+1

01

02

Check

Yes

But re-submission is required.

+1

Same as previous report

02

01

Regardless of the value for "Resubmission" field

No

Invalid combination

02

02

Regardless of the value for "Resubmission" field

No

+1

Same as previous report

03

01

Regardless of the value for "Resubmission" field

No

Invalid combination

03

02

Regardless of the value for "Resubmission" field

No

+1

Same as previous report

No ACK in case of parse error, file name error, etc. MHLW will send the company an email to notify. Resubmission of the case required.

Check

No

+1

Same as previous report

 

Section 1.30: Drugrecurreadministration Export Logic for Japanese

Section 1.31: Exporting of Blinded/Unblinded records

The system will not consider the Code broken or other fields related to blinding/unblinding in ARIS schema.

The system will consider the 1 ('Blinded') or 2 ("UnBlinded") value set in the DISTRIBUTION_OF_AER_INFO.BLINDED_REPORT column and would export the blinded/unblinded records along with normal records accordingly.  

 

Scenarios during export:

SNO

DISTRIBUTION_OF_AER_INFO

(BLINDING_REPORT ) COLUMN

OUTPUT IN ICSR

1

1(YES )

NORMAL + BLINDED RECORD

2

2(NO)

NORMAL + UN-BLINDED RECORD

 

Exception :The below mentioned third and fourth scenarios would be an exception in the current release and may not work as ARISg should be corrected to update the correct values in the DISTRIBUTION_OF_AER_INFO table.

 

SNO

ADMIN PROTOCOL

(CODE_BROKEN)

DISTRIBUTION_OF_AER

_INFO (BLINDING_REPORT ) COLUMN

Expected OUTPUT IN ICSR

EXCEPTIONS

1

NO

YES

NORMAL + BLINDED RECORD

 

2

NO

NO

NORMAL + UN-BLINDED RECORD

 

3

YES / NA / NULL

 What Ever Specified

NORMAL + UN-BLINDED RECORD

This scenario will get failed, since ARISg should consider the code broken fields to override Format details set in Distribution conditions which is currently not handled.

4

-

NULL

ALL Normal records  

In the current system Null will not be present in any scenario how ever if this exists then All the Normal records should be exported.

 But as discussed, this scenario will be a Limitation in the Current release.

 

NOT_RELEVANT Flag at the Drug level( In ARISg AER_PRODUCT Screen)

 

All blinded records will be exported irrespective of the "Not relevant" flag value. Unblinded records will be considered for "Not relevant" flag. When the NOT_RELEVANT Flag is checked, then that Un-blinded record will not be exported. And also the Normal records marked as "Not relevant" in ARISg product screen will not be exported.  

 

AUTO_RANK: (The sequence in which records to be exported):

 

The system will be enhanced to consider the auto rank for blinded records also.  The system will export the drug details in the following order for blinded and unblinded reports. That is, the ordering will be based on AER_PRODUCT.AUTO_RANK_BLIND column.

 

Blinded Report

The drug blocks for Normal+blinded records will be exported in the same order in which they are displayed in the Standard ARISg product screens. That is, the ordering will be based on AER_PRODUCT.AUTO_RANK_BLIND column.

 

Unblinded Report

For an Unblinded Report the ordering of drug blocks in ICSR will be, first all the Normal records will be exported and then the Unblinded Records will be exported. That is, the ordering will be based on AER_PRODUCT.AUTO_RANK_BLIND column.

 

Section 1.32